Blog 2


Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:107%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

After listening to the pod cast it was definitely troubling to me to hear what workers have to go though in China so that we are able to have our smart phones and other devices. At the same time I’m not going to act like this is the first time I have heard this type of situation. For example there has been news of Nike having sweatshops for as long as I can remember and it hasn’t seemed to hurt them too much. Also, while I find the working conditions wrong I don’t think it is going to stop me from purchasing electronics and other products that are made this way. I think there are two major problems that are causing this.

The first problem is, like me, the majority of consumers see two things when purchasing a product. They see the product itself and a price. To keep this price low producers have to take advantage of other countries that have lower standards of living and working conditions. While there are some companies out there like Patagonia, who pride themselves on how their product are made, I think the market for these products  is way too small for the majority of companies to join. Not saying that Americans are selfish, but if by buying products that are made under poor working conditions gives them a healthier life style they are going to do so.  What I mean by a healthier lifestyle is the money the saved by buying the cheaper product. For example if there were two identical smartphones and one cost $50 more, but states that it was produced in a factory that has higher working standards than its competitor, I still don’t think it would convince to many people to buy it. When people are looking at smart phones they care about what features it has and not where it was made.

                The second major problem and main problem in my mind with this situation is the living standards that are set by these foreign countries. I think a lot of companies make themselves feel better about the situation because they are able to say that they are giving the workers a higher standard of living than what the workers would normally have. From the pod cast we heard that there are over 400,000 workers at the factory. I think this shows that 400,000 people feel that working at the factory is better than other jobs they could get or not having a job at all. I mean it’s not like they are being held there and forced to work. Don’t get me wrong I don’t think that it is right to have 13 year old workers, or have people work 34 hours straight, but are these companies really the ones at fault here. While it might not be morally right to the average American, companies follow laws not moral obligations.  If we want there to be change we need to change the laws and not press on them morality, especially when these moral obligations are only held by countries with higher living standards like the U.S.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Blog 2

  1. I think you make some really good points. Most people understand that the working conditions are poor in these factories; however, when it comes down to it, consumers are looking for a low price and a great product.
    But I’m not sure it’s fair to say that there isn’t room for moral obligations. It is certainly valid to say that most consumers are likely to buy a less expensive phone when comparing one made in fair conditions and one in unfair. However, is it possible for both of these phones to be manufactured in fair conditions? I’m sure it would be challenging to make this happen, convincing all technology companies to change their habits. But, right now consumers can only choose between phones that are all manufactured under poor conditions. Perhaps a better alternative is to give consumers a different choice, between phones that are all manufactured under fair conditions.

  2. I think your blog post connects great with what we were talking about in class last week. Companies have to act legally, but this does not mean that they have to act ethically as well. Some companies have been successful by advertising that their product is made in America, but I agree with you when you say that consumers are not always willing to pay the higher price for these products. Realistically, people are cheap and selfish. If all consumers really cared about where their products came from, I’m guessing we would see a change in how many products are manufactured. But, for now, it seems as though sweatshops and poor working conditions are going to stick around.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s